Home
W&WW Blog Case Histories Books Shop Amazon Member Survey Advertise ?
Buyer's Guide News Help Forum Ask Tom! Jobs Videos Online Training

Water and Wastewater.com Help Forums

Click here now

Search

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Jun 18th, 2013, 12:53am
Top 10 Members
Runyan Sobisch Keenan Seghers Santa Cruz Gillen Kendall Orlebeke Ayrus Kersey
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
FILAMENTOUS BULKING (Read 726 times)
noddy001
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 12


Company or Organization: WWTP
FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Apr 17th, 2012, 12:42am
 
Hello, Please Help;

We have had trouble with High SVI of above 300. In 30 mins sludge settles to only approx 980 out of 1000.

We got a lab identification done on the the activated sludge which states a frequent but not abundant amount of filaments largely outside the floc or extend from the floc into the bulk solution or bridge the various pieces of floc together. Sphaerotilus are the dominant type.

Process flow is 2100m3/day 5 days a week with a BOD of 300g/m3 Screened -> DAF -> 30/70 flow split to one SBR and continuous extended aeration.

Approx 10000kg biomass exist in both systems but with SBR getting 70% of the load we are getting the same symptoms in both systems.

Process changes were made late last year which were sending all WAS to our equalization tanks both of which are mixed and we run no lower than 50%. Could we be producing the filaments here? then flowing though the DAF and ending up in our ponds?

We are getting complete nitrification and our nitrates are low Phosphorus levels were approx 20g/m3

Many thanks
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #1 - Apr 17th, 2012, 8:50am
 
Sending WAS to the EQ tank is never a good idea. Not only can you  generate sulfides and organic acids (fermentation- which can lead to filaments- type 0411, N. Limicola 1,II, III, type 0914, type 0961, 021N, Thiothrix I and II and zooglea problems), you can also generate some nasty odors. Then if you have a hickup with the DAF you loose all your wasting control and you can get a real mess.

The recommended control strategy for S. Natans is increasing the dissolved oxygen and lowering the F/M ratio (increasing the MLSS-opposite of what your intuition would suggest). Chlorination will help, but should be done by experienced hands/ especially SBRs which need to be "bombed" because there is no RAS line to dose.

A second opinion is always a good idea. Please contact me if you'd like me to do an eval for you before you make any process changes. (I'll do it for free as a professional courtesy)

best regards,

Ryan
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #2 - Apr 17th, 2012, 10:45am
 
I would also be skeptical of having S. Natans in an extended aeration plant, not saying it can't happen though. If your SVI is 300 you have something going on-either he undervalued the amount of filaments or there's slime bulking.

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
noddy001
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 12


Company or Organization: WWTP
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #3 - Apr 17th, 2012, 8:01pm
 
Thanks Ryan,

And thank you for your offer for microscopic exam but we are a long way away, might just have to find someone else here to have a second look.

Since we have made our setpoints in our EQ tanks higher (we used to run them @ around 30%) our DAF has run really clean because of the buffering so I thought our filaments were going to be the sort that like the lower F:M. We also have plenty of DO in both systems.







Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
noddy001
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 12


Company or Organization: WWTP
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #4 - Apr 18th, 2012, 7:01pm
 
I done a SVI and a DSVI

SVI = settled to 990ml in 30min MLSS @ 3000gm/3 SVI = 330

50% DSVI = settled to 940ml in 30min

is the DSVI equation for 50% water 50% MLSS;

940x2x1000/3000 ? if so DSVI = 626

Does this confirm filamentous bulking?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
argfin
Full Member
***
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 145


Company or Organization: None
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #5 - Apr 20th, 2012, 3:52am
 
Hi All,


Can I ask a slightly off the topic question?

I have seen replies that a higher / lower F:M is needed to get rid of filament X, but I have never seen a reference as to what the F:M relates to. I assume it's the COD F:M being referred to?
Are filaments ever caused by high ammonia F:M?



Thanks,
argfin.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #6 - Apr 20th, 2012, 12:10pm
 
F/M is the amount of food (lbs) to the amount of biomass (lbs) within the plant. Causes for filament growth are low F/M, low DO (for the applied F/M), organic acids/ septicity, oil and grease, lack of nutrients, and low pH (for fungi). Ammonia is not a cause for their growth.

best regards,

Ryan
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #7 - Apr 20th, 2012, 12:12pm
 
"food" is usually lbs per day BOD. Some plants use COD for this. Personally I use a coorelation based on the % of COD that is BOD.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
argfin
Full Member
***
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 145


Company or Organization: None
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #8 - Apr 23rd, 2012, 1:29am
 
Hi Sludgefather,

So it is only really organotrophic FM that is being referenced in regards to fillaments?


Thanks,
argfin.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #9 - Apr 23rd, 2012, 10:13am
 
Yes. This is based of off your BOD or COD. (organic material) Of particular imprortance is the soluble BOD/COD. (how readily available is it)

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
argfin
Full Member
***
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 145


Company or Organization: None
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #10 - Apr 25th, 2012, 8:15am
 
Thanks.

argfin.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
almar1965
God Member
*****
Offline

Composting is the
work of Satan !!

Posts: 1291
Santiago
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Sinquiver Ltda
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #11 - May 4th, 2012, 10:23pm
 
Hi

S.Natans is normally associated with plant overloads. Reduce the F:M by increasing MLSS and increase the dissolved oxygen level if possible.

regards
Alistair
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
noddy001
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 12


Company or Organization: WWTP
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #12 - May 7th, 2012, 9:47pm
 
Hi Alistair,

Thanks, yes we increased the DO and slowly increasing the MLSS in the SBR to around 4000g/m3.

We did lower our MLSS from 5000 to 3500 from September 11 till January 12 and stayed steady from January till just recently (Winter and Summer MLSS) so effectivly we increased our F:M but our F:M is quite low;

SBR = .056
Continuous Ponds = .03

Another thing to add is our supernatant in both systems is really clear.


Regards,
Brendon
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
noddy001
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 12


Company or Organization: WWTP
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #13 - Jul 8th, 2012, 10:25pm
 
Hi,

If we have sumps/tanks that have built up sludges from a screwpress and DAF  that is most likely anaerobic and contains sulfides/sulphates, which then flow to the biological treatment, could we be producing the S.Natans in these places and then sending them to the SBR? Or could the S.Natans simply not survive/thrive if the conditions are not right for them in the SBR?

We have increased the DO setpoints and increased the MLSS but have not seen an improvement yet. I guess it could be still early to tell because our sludge age in the SBR is around 100 days

Cheers.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
h2obuilding
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 10


Company or Organization: H2o Building Services
Re: FILAMENTOUS BULKING
Reply #14 - Jul 9th, 2012, 3:26am
 
Here are some guidelines that may be applied to a conventional activated sludge plant:
1. There must be sufficient aeration to maintain a dissolved oxygen concentration of at least two mg/L at all times throughout the aeration tanks.
2. Dissolved oxygen should be present at all times in the treated wastewater in the final settling tanks.
3. Activated sludge must be returned continuously from the final settling tanks to the aeration tanks.
4. Optimum rate of returning activated sludge will vary with each installation and with different load factors.  In general, it will range from 20 to 40 percent of the influent wastewater flow for diffused air and 10 to 40 percent for mechanical aeration units.
5. The optimum mix liquor suspended solids concentration in the aeration tanks may vary considerably, but usually is in the range of 600 to 3000 mg/L.  Optimum MLSS concentrations should be determined experimentally for each plant.
6. A sludge volume index of about 100 and a sludge age of three to fifteen days are normal for most plants.  When the optimum sludge volume index is established for a plant, it should be maintained within a reasonably narrow range.  A substantial increase in SVI is a warning of trouble ahead.
7. The suspended solids content in the aeration tanks may partially be controlled by the amount of sludge returned to them.  All sludge in excess of that needed in the aeration tanks must be removed from the system.  It should be removed in small amounts continuously or at frequent intervals rather than in large amounts at any one time.  Sludge held too long in the final settling tank will become septic, lose its activity and deplete the necessary dissolved oxygen content in the the tank.
8. Septic conditions in the primary sedimentation tanks will adversely affect the functioning of the activated sludge process.  Prechlorination or pre-aeration may be used to forestall septic conditions in the wastewater entering the aeration tanks. Septic primaries have been shown to cause filamentous bulking.
9. Periodic or sudden organic overloads that may result from large amounts of sludge digester overflow to the primary tanks or from doses of industrial wastes having an excessive BOD or containing toxic chemicals will usually cause operating difficulties.  Whenever possible, overloading should be minimized by controlling the discharge or by pretreatment of such deleterious wastes.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged