Home
W&WW Blog Case Histories Books Shop Amazon Member Survey Advertise ?
Buyer's Guide News Help Forum Ask Tom! Jobs Videos Online Training

Water and Wastewater.com Help Forums

Click here now

Search

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
May 22nd, 2013, 10:28pm
Top 10 Members
Runyan Sobisch Keenan Seghers Santa Cruz Gillen Kendall Orlebeke Ayrus Kersey
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations (Read 525 times)
redeady
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

"WHEN THE
WELL'S DRY, WE KNOW
THE WORTH OF
WATER"

Posts: 27
Industrial Plant
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Sheffield Bio-Science
Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
May 24th, 2012, 1:45pm
 
Greetings;

I'm trying to improve operations at our sites industrial WWTP and hoping to find some of the answers on this forum.

We have 3 clarifiers that, for some reason, have been modified from their original design.  The outlet from the scum box has been blocked so that all floatables eventually fill the the box.  Once full, an operator climbs onto the clarifier and the box is scooped out manually into a bucket, then disposed of into a dumpster.  

If I'm not mistaken, the floatables would normally run into a collection box, then evetually return to the head of the plant.  Is the collection box a place where manually cleaning can take place?

Is there a flushing system that is incorporated to help move the "scum" along.  Can modifications be made to this part of the system to improve the handling of the "scum."

The clarifiers are 40 years old and may need some upgrading.

Thanks in advance,

redeady

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Jeff Naumann
God Member
*****
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 1133
Torrance, California
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Jeff Naumann & Associates
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #1 - May 24th, 2012, 2:20pm
 
What type of waste water is treated at this facility?

Why would the company block the outflow from the scum collection box?  Makes no sense to me.  I would NOT think that you would want to send the floatables back to the head of the plant.  You want to REMOVE the floatables.  Having an operate climb out onto the clarifier with a bucket seems not to be very smart, and probably dangerous.

Regarding "moving the scum along," I would think that something could be done.  Tell us more about what's being treated; and, maybe someone will have better ideas.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
Tom Keenan - nesa
God Member
*****
Offline

Environmental
Consultant - contact
info@nesa.ie

Posts: 2103

Gender: male

Company or Organization: nesa environmental consultants
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #2 - May 25th, 2012, 3:09am
 
Has the scum box been blocked accidentially or on purpose?
Back to top
 
 

tomkeenan@nesa.ie
Environmental Consultant
www.nesa.ie
WWW   IP Logged
commissioning guy
Senior Member
****
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 292


Company or Organization: SWS
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #3 - May 26th, 2012, 2:20am
 
The only time I would purposely close the outlet of the scum box would be if it was observed that during operation of the final tank (or primary tank for that matter), there was too much water going down this line in relation to how much scum is being collected.  Typically this mixture would be pumped directly into the sludge tanks but filling sludge tanks with just water isn't the best, not least the costs for pumping water.

I would off course ensure the scum box was emptied once a day (opening the outlet valve), and that would ensure that the minimal amount of water was removed along with the scum/FOG.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
redeady
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

"WHEN THE
WELL'S DRY, WE KNOW
THE WORTH OF
WATER"

Posts: 27
Industrial Plant
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Sheffield Bio-Science
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #4 - May 29th, 2012, 11:11am
 
All;

To Tom's question first.  Yes, the outlet was intentionally blocked.  Apparently the system never worked well and this was the procedure (although a poor one) that was established.

So the outlet was plugged intentionally as a result of "it" constantly plugging "itself."

I must point out that this practice was discontinued after sharing details with our she manager.

It's time to find a better solution!

On to Jeff's reply.  Our wastes are from the manufacture of pharma and food products.  They are the residuals from meat, soy, casein, wheat and corn products.

Some of our products produce the amino acid tyrisine which generally stays solubilized in our products, but some turns granular and makes it way to the WWTP.  It doesn't break down and, of course, it floats.  We also use use a filter aid (perlite) that will occassionally float and not break down.  

These two items mix with floating sludge, slime and algae to form the "goo" that deposits into the scum box.

I'm just wondering if others have had similar problems and how they solved the plugging issues through modifications and upgrades.

Commisioning Guy.  We our WWTP has only one set of claifiers that follow extended aeration tanks.  I'm not sure if that makes a difference or not.

Thanks,
redeady
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Jeff Naumann
God Member
*****
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 1133
Torrance, California
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Jeff Naumann & Associates
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #5 - May 29th, 2012, 11:47am
 
We our WWTP has only one set of claifiers that follow extended aeration tanks.  I'm not sure if that makes a difference or not.

Do you mean that there is no type of "primary" clarifier, or DAF before the aeration tank(s)?  And, this scum is from the "final" clarifiers?  And, this for a food/pharma plant?  If so, it sounds like you need a whole re-thinking of the system.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
redeady
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

"WHEN THE
WELL'S DRY, WE KNOW
THE WORTH OF
WATER"

Posts: 27
Industrial Plant
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Sheffield Bio-Science
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #6 - May 30th, 2012, 12:46pm
 
All - more specifically Jeff N.

Nope, we have no primary clarifiers.  Plant wastes run to an equalization tank which primarily balances out caustic and acid additions for equipment cleaning, then proceeds to 3 - 210000 gallon
aeration tanks before entering the clarifiers.

Our system is (original) 40 years old and obviously needs re-evaluating and upgrading.

In many ways we are starting over.  Our parent company is lookig to aggressively expand business which will result in more waste down the pipe.  The problem is, we already haul excessive waste off site for processing and what we do waste, we do so with a 40 year old vaccuum filter.  We are lucky to get 10% solids.

I'm getting off topic, which was the clarifier issue.  I focused on that due to the safety concerns.

Any other thoughts on equipment and operations are appreciated.  Maybe I'll start a new "starting over" topic in the near future.

redeady





Do you mean that there is no type of "primary" clarifier, or DAF before the aeration tank(s)?  And, this scum is from the "final" clarifiers?  And, this for a food/pharma plant?  If so, it sounds like you need a whole re-thinking of the system.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
commissioning guy
Senior Member
****
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 292


Company or Organization: SWS
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #7 - May 30th, 2012, 1:41pm
 
You mentioned the system never worked well (which would suggest it did work), and then it was blocked and this procedure was poor at best.  So what is best would be my first question, could you unblock it and try the original design?

Normally scum boxes have a "flush" system built in so when the half bridge goes past, a rocker arm opens a flap to allow water from the tank to wash down the box and move it's contents to a wet well.

You can also retro fit a system that has a collection funnel which is positioned just below the outlet weir, and water along with solids/scum always flows down the line.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
srknk
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

Water and
Wastewater.com is
the best!

Posts: 21

Gender: male

Company or Organization: Passavant-Roediger
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #8 - May 30th, 2012, 3:23pm
 
I see not only here these scum boxes make trouble an so client does.
I would advice that the pipe diameters of these sum boxes must be minumum 150 mm for proper removal. If the diameter is not big enough this scum clogs the entire pipe till self-cleaning pipe so it does not work.
I have exprienced another solution, there is small basin located on the upper scrapper with a submersible pump that can be controlled by operator on the  bridge with a low-high cotroller. Operator lowers the basin and start the pump and pump sucks the foam. this is parctical but needs extra costs.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
redeady
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

"WHEN THE
WELL'S DRY, WE KNOW
THE WORTH OF
WATER"

Posts: 27
Industrial Plant
Gender: male

Company or Organization: Sheffield Bio-Science
Re: Safety Concerns With Clarifier Operations
Reply #9 - Jun 3rd, 2012, 7:06pm
 
All;

I appreciate the insight.  I think a visit to another WWTP to obsevre a properly operating clarifier, particularly "floatables" removal, would be beneficial.  

Any other thoghts are welcome.

Thanks again!

redeady
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged