Home
W&WW Blog Case Histories Books Shop Amazon Member Survey Advertise ?
Buyer's Guide News Help Forum Ask Tom! Jobs Videos Online Training

Water and Wastewater.com Help Forums

Click here now

Search

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
May 24th, 2013, 1:11am
Top 10 Members
Runyan Sobisch Keenan Seghers Santa Cruz Gillen Kendall Orlebeke Ayrus Kersey
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
Nutrient Source for SBR System (Read 484 times)
MacVeigh
Junior Member
**
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 58

Gender: male

Company or Organization: EPA
Nutrient Source for SBR System
Aug 03rd, 2012, 12:50am
 
Which is a better source for N dosing as a nutrient source, Urea or DAP?

Based on the raw wastewater quality, our influent wastewater is nitrogen deficient therefore we need to provide or dose specific amounts of N before aerobic digestion. However which of the two, urea or DAP, would be the best source of N? I've heard that Urea is not really recommended since N from Urea is not bioavailable for the bugs but im not sure with this since ive read on some reasearch that urea is considered as a preferred nitrogen source in enhancing biodegradation, because of its high nitrogen content and availability.

Based on your experiences, which do you prefer between the two?

Opinions and recommendations will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Smiley
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #1 - Aug 3rd, 2012, 6:31am
 
DAP (diammonium phoshate) should be about 20% N and 20%P. If you don't need the phosphorous you won't want to add extra because you'll probably pay for removing it chemically on the backend.

Urea (somewhere around 40-50% nitrogen) is a good source. Enzymes are needed to break this down to ammonia, but these should be present in your MLSS to begin with. Typically the only time there's problems with urea is if the OUR (oxygen uptake rate) is very high and the urea can't be broken down by the time the bacteria need it as a nutrient.

Before doing any nutrient addition I would do the following: Take a sample of your MLSS right before the settling cycle, filter it, and test it for ammonia, nitrate, and nitrtire. Add the three up and if it's around 1 mg/L there's plenty of nitrogen available. (You want to see a small residual left over). For phosphorous you'll want to make sure you have >0.5 or so orthophoshate mg/L in the filtered MLSS.

Also a reverse india ink stain is recommended to judge the "slime" levels in the sludge. Elevated EPS (slime) can be indicative of nutrient deficient conditions. Of note- the 100:5:1 ratio is only a starting point- typically the maximum amount needed. Each plant's actual nutrient demands are different and less may be needed. The biggest factors here are with increased temperature and as the sludge age gets longer more nutrients are recycled throughout the process and bacteria die and less are needed. Also note that sometimes the required ratio may be different seasonally, as in the winter there's less endogeny due to slower metabolism of the bacteria-therefore less nutrient recyced and a higher nutrient demand.

hope this helps,

Ryan Hennessy
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MacVeigh
Junior Member
**
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 58

Gender: male

Company or Organization: EPA
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #2 - Aug 3rd, 2012, 11:51am
 
Thank you very much Ryan for the detailed response. If i may ask a few more questions: when you say a very high OUR what should the range be in mg O2/min? And why use orthophospate as basis for Phosphorus nutrient dosing?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #3 - Aug 3rd, 2012, 1:01pm
 
I'd consider anything over 55 mg/L/hr (the speed limit) high for OUR. Orthophoshate should be tested in the filtered residual because this is phosphorous in a soluble form which is readily available to the bacteria as a nutrient.

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MacVeigh
Junior Member
**
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 58

Gender: male

Company or Organization: EPA
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #4 - Aug 4th, 2012, 3:29am
 
Sorry if i ask too many questions, but can you please explain a bit further why Overproduction of EPS (slime) can be indicative of nutrient deficient conditions. What exactly happens when too much slime is produced?

Also, why a high OUR is a limiting factor in breaking down urea?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #5 - Aug 4th, 2012, 8:22am
 
The bacteria will produce slime due to a shunt metabolism or unbalanced growth when they don't have the nutrients available to produce N and P containing cell material.

OUR can be a factor because the nutrients have to be in a form for the bacteria to take up. (ammonia, nitrate, orthophoshate) If the OUR is high, the bugs are growing quickly and need the nutrients readily available. In the case of urea if the enzymes haven't broken it down into ammonia, it's not available at the time. Sometimes in these cases nutrients need to be dosed on the incoming orthophoshate and ammonia. This is rare though.

What type of wastewater are you treating?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
The sludge judge
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 649
Wisconsin
Gender: male

Company or Organization: private
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #6 - Aug 4th, 2012, 8:25am
 
Too much slime leads to bulking and poor dewatering because the flocs can't compact and settle well. (lots of slime in between them)
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MacVeigh
Junior Member
**
Offline

I love Water and
Wastewater.com

Posts: 58

Gender: male

Company or Organization: EPA
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #7 - Aug 5th, 2012, 9:30pm
 
Thank you very much for answering my inquiries, we are treating wastewater from a yogurt factory, do you have any experiences with this type of wastewater? normally what problems should we expect when treating yogurt wastewater?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Tom Keenan - nesa
God Member
*****
Offline

Environmental
Consultant - contact
info@nesa.ie

Posts: 2103

Gender: male

Company or Organization: nesa environmental consultants
Re: Nutrient Source for SBR System
Reply #8 - Aug 6th, 2012, 6:02am
 
Generally the main issue with this type of facility will be pH, as cleaning cycles are used in the production area. Fats oils greased can also be an issue, but if losses from the production area are carefully controlled they should not cause a problem in the WWTP.
Nitrogen deficiency can sometimes be an issue, and generally urea can be a successful solution.
Back to top
 
 

tomkeenan@nesa.ie
Environmental Consultant
www.nesa.ie
WWW   IP Logged