The authoritative resource for consulting engineers, utility managers, and municipal decision-makers tracking Kentucky’s wastewater infrastructure landscape.
Kentucky’s wastewater infrastructure represents a complex dichotomy between the advanced, high-capacity systems of the “Golden Triangle” (Louisville, Lexington, and Northern Kentucky) and the decentralized challenges of the Appalachian and rural western regions. The Commonwealth manages a robust network of treatment facilities overseen by the Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW), ensuring compliance with both the Clean Water Act and specific Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission (ORSANCO) standards.
Currently, Kentucky faces significant engineering challenges related to Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) in its historic river cities, requiring multi-billion dollar consent decree investments. Additionally, the state is grappling with unique geological constraints, specifically the extensive karst topography in the south-central region, which complicates conveyance design. With over 4.5 million residents served and a resurgence in industrial manufacturing (particularly in the EV battery sector), the demand for treatment capacity expansion and technological upgrades is at an all-time high.
In the last 36 months, Kentucky has seen a massive influx of capital directed toward wet weather management and biosolids optimization. The Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) recently completed the massive Waterway Protection Tunnel, a pivotal component of their IOAP (Integrated Overflow Abatement Plan). Similarly, Sanitation District No. 1 (SD1) in Northern Kentucky is advancing its “Clean H2O40” program, utilizing smart sewer technology to optimize storage and conveyance rather than solely relying on gray infrastructure expansion.
Funding availability has surged due to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), administered through the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority (KIA). Significant focus is also being placed on resilience following the catastrophic 2022 flooding in Eastern Kentucky, prompting new designs for flood-proof lift stations and treatment plants. Furthermore, the massive BlueOval SK Battery Park in Glendale has triggered urgent requirements for new municipal infrastructure in Hardin County to support the influx of industrial wastewater and population growth.
The following table ranks the largest wastewater treatment plants in Kentucky by design capacity (MGD). Data is compiled from KDOW facility reports, EPA ECHO databases, and municipal utility annual reports.
| Rank | Plant Name | City/Location | Design Capacity (MGD) | Population Served | Operating Authority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morris Forman WQTC | Louisville | 120.0 | 650,000+ | Louisville MSD |
| 2 | Dry Creek WWTP | Villa Hills (N. KY) | 46.5 | 280,000+ | Sanitation District No. 1 (SD1) |
| 3 | Town Branch WWTP | Lexington | 30.0 | 160,000 | Lexington-Fayette UCG |
| 4 | Derek R. Guthrie WQTC | Louisville | 26.5 | 185,000 | Louisville MSD |
| 5 | West Hickman Creek WWTP | Lexington | 21.0 | 110,000 | Lexington-Fayette UCG |
| 6 | Max E. Walters Regional WQTC | Owensboro | 16.0 | 60,000 | RWRA |
| 7 | Bowling Green WWTP | Bowling Green | 15.0 | 75,000 | Bowling Green Municipal Utilities |
| 8 | Paducah WWTP | Paducah | 14.0 | 25,000 | Paducah McCracken JPA |
| 9 | Hite Creek WQTC | Louisville | 11.0 | 60,000 | Louisville MSD |
| 10 | Hopkinsville Hammond-Wood | Hopkinsville | 10.5 | 32,000 | Hopkinsville Water Env. Authority |
| 11 | Elizabethtown WWTP | Elizabethtown | 9.5 | 30,000 | City of Elizabethtown |
| 12 | Western Regional WRF | Union | 8.5 | 45,000 | Sanitation District No. 1 (SD1) |
| 13 | Richmond WWTP | Richmond | 8.0 | 36,000 | Richmond Utilities |
| 14 | Frankfort WWTP | Frankfort | 7.9 | 28,000 | City of Frankfort |
| 15 | Georgetown WWTP | Georgetown | 7.5 | 35,000 | Georgetown Municipal Water |
| 16 | Floyds Fork WQTC | Louisville | 6.5 | 38,000 | Louisville MSD |
| 17 | Winchester WWTP | Winchester | 6.0 | 19,000 | Winchester Municipal Utilities |
| 18 | Ashland WWTP | Ashland | 6.0 | 20,000 | City of Ashland |
| 19 | Eastern Regional WRF | Alexandria | 5.5 | 25,000 | Sanitation District No. 1 (SD1) |
| 20 | Henderson North WWTP | Henderson | 5.5 | 28,000 | Henderson Water Utility |
Treatment Process: The flagship facility for MSD utilizes pure oxygen activated sludge secondary treatment. It features advanced preliminary treatment with coarse and fine screening to handle the heavy combined sewer load.
Infrastructure Highlights: Morris Forman is the regional hub for solids processing. It utilizes anaerobic digestion and a massive thermal hydrolysis process (THP) currently being integrated to produce Class A biosolids. The plant generates substantial renewable energy via methane capture and cogeneration.
Recent Upgrades: A major $200M+ Biosolids Processing Solution project is underway to replace aging dryers with new technology to produce marketable fertilizer pellets.
Treatment Process: Conventional activated sludge with biological nutrient removal capabilities. The plant handles flows from a significant portion of the Cincinnati metropolitan area lying within Kentucky.
Infrastructure Highlights: Dry Creek serves as the central control node for SD1’s expansive network of pump stations and equalization tanks.
Compliance: Operating under an amended consent decree, the facility has seen significant investment in wet weather flow management to reduce CSOs into the Ohio River.
Treatment Process: Advanced secondary treatment utilizing oxidation ditches and vertical loop reactors. Tertiary treatment includes deep bed gravity filters and UV disinfection.
Recent Upgrades: As part of Lexington’s EPA Consent Decree, Town Branch has undergone massive rehabilitation, including a new Wet Weather Flow Storage facility capable of holding 22 million gallons.
Treatment Process: Uses a vertical shaft oxidation ditch system. It is a key facility for managing suburban growth in southern Jefferson County.
Infrastructure: Known for its energy efficiency and automated SCADA integration. The plant utilizes UV disinfection to eliminate chlorine hazards.
Treatment Process: Utilizes vertical loop reactors for biological treatment. The plant is critical for the rapidly growing southern sector of Lexington.
Notable Features: Recipient of multiple NACWA Peak Performance Awards. Recent projects include filter improvements and chemical feed system upgrades for phosphorus removal.
Kentucky utilities are currently executing over $750 million in capital improvement projects driven largely by Consent Decree compliance and economic development.
Kentucky facilities operate under the Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (KPDES), managed by the Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW). The regulatory landscape is heavily influenced by the EPA’s focus on eliminating sanitary sewer overflows.
Karst Topography: A unique challenge for Kentucky engineers, particularly in the Bowling Green and South Central areas, is the limestone karst geology. Pipe bedding failures and sinkholes are constant risks, requiring specialized geotechnical engineering for all conveyance projects.
Workforce Development: Like many states, Kentucky faces a “Silver Tsunami” of retiring operators. Opportunities exist for firms offering automation, remote SCADA monitoring, and operational consulting to bridge the skills gap.
Browse our resources for specific plant data. (Full directory links to be populated)
Kentucky has over 250 municipal wastewater treatment plants, ranging from the massive 120 MGD Morris Forman facility to small package plants serving rural communities.
The Morris Forman Water Quality Treatment Center in Louisville is the largest, with a design capacity of 120 MGD and wet weather handling capabilities exceeding 300 MGD.
The three largest utility operators—Louisville MSD, Lexington-Fayette UCG, and Sanitation District No. 1 (Northern KY)—are all currently executing projects under federal Consent Decrees to reduce sewer overflows.
Funding is primarily available through the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority (KIA), which administers the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). Additional funding has been made available through the federal IIJA and Cleaner Water Program grants.
The Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW) and the Department for Environmental Protection have initiated statewide sampling studies to determine the prevalence of PFAS in wastewater effluent and biosolids, though specific discharge limits are pending federal EPA finalization.