Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit

1) INTRODUCTION

UV disinfection systems are frequently over-simplified during the preliminary design phase as “pipes with lights,” leading to significant operational headaches down the line. A common challenge engineers face is distinguishing between conventional UV reactor designs and newer optical technologies when high-level pathogen log removal (e.g., Adenovirus) or difficult water matrices are involved. Statistics indicate that up to 30% of UV systems in industrial and challenging municipal applications fail to meet their validated dose consistently due to underestimating water quality variability or fouling rates. This oversight often forces operators to run systems at 100% power continuously, destroying the projected Return on Investment (ROI) based on energy savings.

The Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit analysis is critical because it represents a choice between two distinct engineering philosophies. Wedeco (Xylem) represents the established standard in both Low Pressure High Output (LPHO) and Medium Pressure (MP) systems, dominating large-scale municipal infrastructure with open channel and closed vessel solutions. Atlantium, conversely, utilizes Hydro-Optic (HOD) technology—a specialized approach using fiber-optic principles and medium pressure lamps to achieve high intensity and real-time monitoring in a compact footprint.

These technologies are utilized across municipal drinking water, wastewater reclamation, aquaculture, and industrial process water (food and beverage, pharma). The operational environments range from pristine permeate to low-UVT (UV Transmittance) wastewater. Proper selection matters because a mismatch can lead to excessive bulb replacement costs, inability to meet permit limits during low-quality water events, or hydraulic bottlenecks. This article will help engineers dissect the technical differences, validate performance claims, and specify the correct architecture for their specific process constraints.

2) HOW TO SELECT / SPECIFY

When evaluating Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit, the engineer must move beyond capital cost and look at the interaction between reactor hydraulics, lamp physics, and the specific biology of the target pathogen.

Duty Conditions & Operating Envelope

The primary differentiator is often the UV Transmittance (UVT) and the target pathogen. Wedeco’s LPHO systems (e.g., Duron, LBX) are highly efficient at 254 nm wavelength, making them ideal for standard disinfection (E. coli, Cryptosporidium, Giardia) in waters with stable UVT (>45% for wastewater, >85% for drinking water). However, if the application requires 4-log Adenovirus inactivation, Medium Pressure (MP) lamps are generally favored due to their polychromatic output which is more effective against Adenovirus repair mechanisms.

Atlantium’s HOD technology is exclusively Medium Pressure based. It excels in applications where the UVT is low or variable, or where high doses are required in a single pass. Engineers must specify the Reduction Equivalent Dose (RED) required. For continuous flow with variable demand, Wedeco’s bank-sequencing in open channels allows for massive turndown ratios. Atlantium systems typically modulate lamp power but have a narrower hydraulic operating window per unit due to the physics of the optical water block.

Materials & Compatibility

Material science differs significantly between the two. Xylem Wedeco reactors are typically constructed of 316L Stainless Steel or Duplex Steel for corrosive environments (like seawater). The lamps are housed in quartz sleeves. In aggressive industrial wastewaters or highly saline environments, the stainless steel reactor body is a potential corrosion point if not properly passivated or coated.

Atlantium takes a different approach. The core of the HOD system is a quartz tube (the reactor body itself is often quartz or lined with a polymer/quartz interface) which utilizes Total Internal Reflection (TIR) to recycle UV light. This minimizes metal-to-water contact in the irradiation zone, which is advantageous for pharmaceutical or high-purity applications where metal ion leaching is a concern. However, the engineer must evaluate the temperature limits; MP lamps run hot (600°C-800°C surface temp), and while the water cools them, sudden flow stoppages require robust safety interlocks to prevent heat damage to the reactor materials.

Read moreA Comparison Between Aerobic And Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Technology

Hydraulics & Process Performance

Hydraulics define the dose distribution. In a standard Wedeco vessel (LBX/Quadron), baffles or mixing plates are used to create turbulence (plug flow) to ensure all fluid particles receive exposure. The head loss is generally predictable and moderate. In Wedeco open channel systems (Duron/TAK), head loss is controlled by level control gates or weirs, keeping lamps submerged.

Atlantium relies on the “light pipe” principle. The hydraulic profile is strictly controlled to ensure light recycling. This often results in a higher head loss across the unit compared to a similarly sized standard LPHO vessel. Engineers must verify the Head Loss vs. Flow curves carefully. If the plant has limited hydraulic grade line (HGL) availability, the higher pressure drop of the HOD system might require booster pumping, impacting the OPEX calculation.

Installation Environment & Constructability

Space constraints often drive the decision. Wedeco’s LPHO systems, while energy-efficient, have a larger footprint due to the number of lamps required to achieve the target dose (low intensity per lamp = more lamps). For retrofits in tight galleries, this can be problematic. Large open-channel systems require significant civil work.

Atlantium units are extremely power-dense. A single HOD unit can often replace a much larger rack of LPHO lamps. The footprint is small, but the electrical infrastructure requirement is high. Engineers must account for the larger amp draw and heat dissipation loads in the electrical room associated with Medium Pressure ballasts. Furthermore, HOD units require specific straight-pipe runs upstream and downstream to protect the optical path, though generally less than magnetic flow meters.

Reliability, Redundancy & Failure Modes

Reliability in UV is defined by lamp life and sleeve fouling.

• Wedeco (LPHO): Lamps last 12,000–16,000 hours. Failure is gradual.
• Wedeco (MP) & Atlantium: MP lamps typically last 4,000–8,000 hours. Failure is often more abrupt regarding intensity drop-off.

Redundancy strategies differ. In a Wedeco channel, redundancy is often N+1 banks. In Atlantium, it is N+1 units. A critical failure mode for Atlantium is the fouling of the quartz reactor walls (since the wall is the reflector). If the wall fouls, the TIR effect is lost, and dose drops catastrophically. Consequently, Atlantium utilizes a rigorous, automated mechanical or hydro-pneumatic wiping system. Wedeco also uses mechanical/chemical wiping, but the consequence of a dirty wall in a stainless reactor is less severe than in an optical recycling reactor.

Controls & Automation Interfaces

Control integration is where the Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit conversation highlights philosophical differences. Xylem Wedeco uses the EcoTouch or similar PLC platforms, integrating seamlessly with plant SCADA (EtherNet/IP, Modbus, Profinet). The control philosophy is typically Flow Pacing or Dose Pacing based on a calculated dose algorithm verified by sensors.

Read moreAdvances in UV and Ozone Disinfection Technologies: Enhancing Pathogen Elimination Methods

Atlantium markets itself on “Real-Time Monitoring.” Because of the optical setup, they claim to measure the actual UVT and intensity integrated across the water column more accurately than a single point sensor in a steel vessel. Their controllers provide extensive data logging for compliance. For industries (F&B, Pharma) requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance, Atlantium’s software is often pre-validated for these audit trails.

Maintainability, Safety & Access

Operator access is critical.
Wedeco Open Channel: Lamps are pulled vertically from the channel. Ideally, this is done while the bank is lifted out of the water. It is labor-intensive but accessible.
Wedeco Closed Vessel: Requires isolation valves and drain-down. LPHO lamps are long (can be 2 meters), requiring significant clearance space for removal.
Atlantium: Lamps are much shorter and easier to handle. However, the units are pressurized and utilize high-intensity heat. Safety interlocks are non-negotiable. Lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures must account for the high voltage and thermal hazards of MP lamps.

Lifecycle Cost Drivers

CAPEX: Wedeco LPHO is generally higher in CAPEX due to the number of lamps, stainless steel volume, and civil works (for channels). Atlantium is often lower CAPEX for equivalent dose in high-flow/high-dose scenarios due to compactness.
OPEX: This is the swing factor. LPHO is roughly 3x more energy-efficient (electrical to germicidal UV conversion) than MP technology. If the plant runs 24/7 at stable flow, Wedeco LPHO will almost always win on power costs. However, if the plant runs intermittently or requires very high dosages (where LPHO lamp counts become absurd), the Atlantium MP system becomes competitive. Consumables (lamps/seals) are more frequent on Atlantium (shorter lamp life) but fewer in quantity.

3) COMPARISON TABLES

The following tables provide a direct side-by-side comparison of the technologies and an application fit matrix. These are designed to help engineers quickly narrow down the suitable technology before entering the detailed design phase.

4) ENGINEER & OPERATOR FIELD NOTES

Real-world experience often diverges from the datasheet. The following notes are compiled from field observations regarding the specification and operation of Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment.

Commissioning & Acceptance Testing

During the Site Acceptance Test (SAT), the most contentious issue is often the correlation between the built-in sensor readings and the handheld reference sensors.
Pro Tip: Ensure the specification requires a “Reference Sensor Check” at 100%, 75%, and 50% power during commissioning.
For Atlantium systems, verify the “Air Block” or wiper mechanism function. If the mechanism sticks during the FAT/SAT, it will fail in the field.
For Wedeco open channel systems, verify level control. The weirs or gates must maintain the water level within the strict band (usually ± 2 cm) relative to the lamp arc length. If the water level drops, the lamps overheat and fail; if it rises too high, the water passes over the lamp bank untreated (short-circuiting).

Common Specification Mistakes

Over-specifying UVT: Engineers often design for the “Average” UVT (e.g., 65%). However, during storm events, UVT in wastewater can drop to 40-50%. If the equipment is selected for 65%, it will alarm and fail to dose adequately during the storm—exactly when disinfection is most critical. Always specify the equipment based on the “Design Low” UVT.

Material Mismatch: Specifying standard 316L Stainless Steel for high-chloride applications (e.g., RO brine or seawater) without requiring Super Duplex or specific passivation. Wedeco offers specific material upgrades, while Atlantium’s quartz body has an inherent advantage here, provided the flange connections are compatible.

O&M Burden & Strategy

Operators prefer predictability. Wedeco’s LPHO lamps have a long life, meaning lamp changes happen perhaps once every 2-3 years per bank. However, changing 400 lamps in a channel is a multi-day heavy labor event.
Atlantium systems might only have 4 to 12 lamps, but they must be changed every 5-6 months. The labor is lighter (minutes, not days), but the frequency is annoying for operators who want “set and forget.”
Spare Parts: For MP systems (Atlantium and Wedeco MP), the ballasts are often proprietary and tuned to the lamp. Shelf life of spare lamps is generally good, but ballasts can degrade. Keep at least one spare ballast per rack/unit.

Troubleshooting Guide

• Symptom: Low Intensity Alarm (Both Systems)
  • Check 1: Is the water quality (UVT) actually lower than design? Use a handheld UVT meter.
  • Check 2: Is the wiper working? Manually cycle the wiper.
  • Check 3: Sensor Fouling. The sensor window itself might be dirty, even if the lamps are clean.

• Symptom: Lamp Failure Alarm (MP Systems)
  • Root Cause: Often heat-related. Check cabinet cooling fans and filters. MP ballasts generate significant heat; if the electrical room AC fails, the ballasts will trip or fail.

5) DESIGN DETAILS / CALCULATIONS

When engineering the system, rigorous calculation is required to ensure the Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment choice meets the validated dose requirements.

Sizing Logic & Methodology

The fundamental equation is Dose = Intensity × Time. However, this is too simple for modern regulatory environments. We rely on Bioassay Validation.

1. Determine Target Log Removal: e.g., 3-log Giardia or 4-log Virus.
2. Identify Design UVT: The lowest expected UVT (e.g., 90% for water, 55% for wastewater).
3. Select Validation Standard:
   • UVDGM (USEPA UV Disinfection Guidance Manual): Standard for US drinking water.
   • NWRI (National Water Research Institute): Standard for Wastewater Reclamation (Title 22).

4. Apply Safety Factors:
   • End of Lamp Life (EOLL) Factor: Typically 0.8 to 0.5 depending on lamp type (LPHO holds output better than MP).
   • Fouling Factor: Typically 0.8 to 0.9 depending on wiper efficiency.

Specification Checklist

To ensure a robust bid package, include these specific requirements:

• Bioassay Validation Report: Must be submitted with the bid, showing validation at the specific flow, UVT, and lamp power range proposed.
• Head Loss Constraints: Define maximum allowable head loss in inches/cm of water column. (Critical for Wedeco vs Atlantium comparison).
• Harmonic Distortion: MP systems (Atlantium) can produce significant electrical noise. Require <5% THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) at the VFD/Ballast input or require active harmonic filters.
• Warranty on Consumables: explicitly state minimum operating hours for lamps (e.g., “12,000 hours prorated”).

Standards & Compliance

Ensure compliance with NSF 60/61 for drinking water contact materials. Electrical components must be UL 508A listed. For wastewater reuse, reference the NWRI Guidelines 2012. Both Xylem Wedeco and Atlantium have validated reactors under these protocols, but the validation “envelope” (the range of flow and UVT allowed) differs per model.

6) FAQ SECTION

What is the main difference between Xylem Wedeco and Atlantium disinfection technology?

The main difference lies in the light source and reactor physics. Xylem Wedeco is known for Low Pressure High Output (LPHO) lamps in standard stainless steel vessels or concrete channels, focusing on high energy efficiency for large flows. Atlantium utilizes Medium Pressure (MP) lamps combined with fiber-optic (Hydro-Optic) reflection principles in a quartz/polymer tube to achieve high intensity and monitoring precision in a compact footprint.

When should I choose Medium Pressure (Atlantium/Wedeco MP) over LPHO (Wedeco)?

Medium Pressure is the engineering choice when: 1) You need to inactivate Adenovirus (requires polychromatic light), 2) Space is extremely limited, 3) The water temperature varies drastically, or 4) The application is industrial/intermittent where the warm-up time of LPHO is a hindrance compared to the high power density of MP. For continuous municipal wastewater flow where energy cost is the driver, LPHO is usually superior.

How does UV Transmittance (UVT) affect equipment selection?

UVT determines how easily UV light penetrates water. In high UVT water (>90%), standard LPHO systems are very efficient. In low UVT water (<45%), light from standard lamps is absorbed within millimeters. Atlantium's high-intensity MP lamps and short optical path lengths can often punch through low UVT water more effectively than standard LPHO configurations, though energy costs will be high.

What is the typical maintenance cost difference?

Xylem Wedeco LPHO systems have lower annual consumable costs because lamps last 12,000+ hours and power consumption is low. However, re-lamping is a major labor event. Atlantium systems have higher consumable costs (lamps last ~5,000 hours and cost more per unit) and higher electricity bills, but the labor time to swap lamps is minimal due to low lamp count and easy access.

Are both systems validated for Title 22 Reuse?

Yes, both manufacturers offer systems validated under NWRI guidelines for Title 22 reuse. However, the validation applies to specific models and operating ranges. You must check the specific validation report for the model proposed to ensure your peak flow and minimum UVT fall within the validated operating envelope.

Why is head loss a major factor in the comparison?

Wedeco Duron systems (open channel) have negligible head loss, making them ideal for gravity-fed wastewater plants. Atlantium units are pressurized and utilize flow restrictors/mixers to ensure optical performance, resulting in higher pressure drops (often 2-5 PSI or more). In gravity systems, selecting Atlantium may trigger the need for intermediate pumping, changing the project scope.

7) CONCLUSION

In the final analysis of Xylem Wedeco vs Atlantium Disinfection Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit, the decision typically bifurcates based on the application sector. For large municipal wastewater treatment plants and drinking water facilities prioritizing 20-year lifecycle energy costs, Xylem Wedeco’s LPHO technology remains the industry benchmark. The efficiency of converting electricity to germicidal photons in LPHO lamps is difficult to beat at scale.

However, Atlantium has carved a vital niche for engineers dealing with “difficult” water. Whether it is the requirement for 4-log Adenovirus credits, fluctuating industrial effluent, aquaculture bio-security, or tight retrofit spaces, the Hydro-Optic technology offers a level of control and intensity that standard vessels struggle to match. The engineer’s role is to perform the lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA) accurately—balancing the higher electricity and lamp costs of the HOD system against the civil works savings and process security it provides. By adhering to strict validation protocols and realistic UVT modeling, either system can be specified to protect public health effectively.