Atlas Copco vs Sulzer (ABS) Aeration Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit

INTRODUCTION

For municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants, aeration typically accounts for 50% to 70% of total plant energy consumption. Consequently, the selection of air generation technology is arguably the single most critical decision influencing a facility’s 20-year operational expenditure (OPEX). Engineers tasked with upgrades or new plant designs frequently encounter a choice between market stalwarts, leading to the necessity of a detailed analysis of Atlas Copco vs Sulzer (ABS) Aeration Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit. While both manufacturers offer high-efficiency solutions, their technological lineages—Atlas Copco stemming from industrial compressed air and Sulzer (ABS) from specialized wastewater fluid handling—result in distinct operational characteristics.

This equipment is primarily utilized in activated sludge processes, membrane bioreactors (MBR), and aerobic digestion systems where oxygen transfer efficiency and reliability are paramount. The operating environment is harsh, characterized by 24/7 duty cycles, high harmonic loads on electrical infrastructure, and the necessity for wide turndown ratios to match diurnal flow variations.

A poor specification in this category often leads to “blow-off” (wasted energy during low demand), surge instability, or premature bearing failures due to heat management issues. This article provides a strictly technical, comparative analysis to help engineers navigate the nuances of magnetic bearings, screw technology, and high-speed turbo blowers to ensure the selected equipment aligns with specific process hydraulics and maintenance capabilities.

HOW TO SELECT / SPECIFY

When evaluating Atlas Copco vs Sulzer (ABS) Aeration Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit, the selection process must move beyond simple nameplate horsepower. The interaction between the blower technology and the system curve determines the actual operating efficiency. The following criteria define the engineering framework for selection.

Duty Conditions & Operating Envelope

The primary driver for selection is the definition of the operating envelope. Wastewater influent flows are rarely static. The system must accommodate Minimum Day/Minimum Month flows (often night-time lows) up to Peak Wet Weather Flows (PWWF).

• Turndown Ratio: This is the ratio of maximum to minimum controllable flow without venting air. Sulzer’s HST magnetic bearing turbo blowers and Atlas Copco’s ZB magnetic bearing units typically offer turndown ratios between 40-100%. However, Atlas Copco’s ZS screw blowers can sometimes achieve wider turndown effectively in lower pressure applications due to positive displacement physics.
• Pressure Fluctuations: In systems with fluctuating water levels (SBRs or deep tanks), positive displacement (Screw) machines (like the AC ZS series) maintain efficiency across varying discharge pressures better than dynamic (Turbo) machines, which are sensitive to discharge pressure changes.
• Temperature Sensitivity: Inlet air temperature affects density and, consequently, oxygen mass transfer. Specifications must define performance at the “worst-case” scenario (typically high ambient summer temperature) to prevent motor overloads or capacity shortfalls.

Materials & Compatibility

While the blower air end is often isolated from the wastewater, the surrounding environment is corrosive (H2S presence). The construction of the enclosure and cooling system is critical.

Read more10 Surprising Benefits of Upgrading Your Aeration Tank System

• Impeller Metallurgy: High-speed turbo blowers utilize impellers spinning at 20,000 to 40,000+ RPM. Materials typically range from high-strength aluminum alloys to titanium. Titanium is preferred for fatigue resistance in high-cycle start/stop applications.
• Cooling Systems: Both manufacturers offer air-cooled and water-cooled options. Air-cooled units require careful HVAC design in the blower room to prevent recirculation of hot air. Water-cooled units (common in larger Sulzer HST or Atlas Copco ZB frames) remove heat load from the room but introduce a water loop maintenance requirement.
• Enclosure Ratings: Standard industrial enclosures may not suffice if the blowers are located near the basins. NEMA 4X (IP66) is rarely standard for the main cabinet but should be considered for HMI and control interfaces.

Hydraulics & Process Performance

The “Wire-to-Air” efficiency metric is the only valid comparison point. This accounts for losses in the inlet filter, the compression element, the motor, the VFD, and the cooling fans.

• Efficiency Curves: Do not select based on a single “Design Point.” Analyze the efficiency curve superimposed over the plant’s diurnal flow profile. A machine that is 2% more efficient at peak flow but 10% less efficient at average flow will cost more to operate.
• Surge Margins: For turbo blowers (dynamic compressors), the surge line is a critical constraint. Operating too close to the surge line causes flow instability and potential damage. Sulzer and Atlas Copco both utilize advanced control logic to map the surge line, but the physical design of the impeller determines the natural surge margin.
• Rise-to-Surge: This defines how much pressure can increase before the machine surges. Systems with high static head variation (deep tanks) require a steeper rise-to-surge characteristic.

Installation Environment & Constructability

Retrofit applications often present significant space constraints. Modern high-speed turbo blowers are significantly smaller than equivalent multistage centrifugal or positive displacement lobe blowers.

• Footprint Density: Both Sulzer HST and Atlas Copco ZB units are “packaged” designs, integrating the VFD, controls, and blow-off valve. This minimizes site wiring but concentrates heat generation.
• Piping Interfaces: Discharge cone expansion is often required immediately after the blower. Specifications must dictate the distance of straight pipe runs required upstream of the inlet to ensure laminar flow for air mass meters.
• Electrical Harmonics: High-speed motors utilizing permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) require specialized VFDs. These drives can generate significant harmonic distortion. Active Front End (AFE) or passive harmonic filters are mandatory specifications to meet IEEE 519 standards at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC).

Reliability, Redundancy & Failure Modes

Read moreA Comparison Between Aerobic And Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Technology

The core technological differentiator often lies in the bearing design.

• Magnetic Bearings (Active): Used by Sulzer HST and Atlas Copco ZB. The shaft levitates. There is no physical contact, theoretically offering infinite bearing life. The risk point is the complexity of the magnetic bearing controller (MBC) and the backup battery/UPS system required to land the shaft safely during a power outage.
• Air Foil Bearings: Used in some smaller turbo units. These are passive and simpler but require a minimum speed to generate the air film (“lift off”). They are susceptible to damage during frequent start/stop cycles if the “landing” wears the foil coating.
• Rolling Element Bearings: Used in Screw Blowers (Atlas Copco ZS). These have a finite life (typically 40,000 to 100,000 hours) and require lubrication, but the failure modes are mechanical and predictable through vibration analysis.

Controls & Automation Interfaces

Modern blowers are essentially computers that compress air. Integration with the plant SCADA is accomplished via industrial protocols (EtherNet/IP, Modbus TCP, PROFINET).

• Master Control Panels (MCP): In multi-blower installations, an MCP is required to sequence the blowers, balance runtime, and optimize efficiency. Atlas Copco offers the “Optimizer 4.0” while Sulzer provides comparable sequencing logic. The MCP must handle the “Split-Range” control if different blower technologies (e.g., one screw blower for base load, turbos for peak) are mixed.
• DO Control Loop: The blower PLC should ideally receive the Dissolved Oxygen (DO) or Ammonia setpoint directly, rather than just a speed reference. This allows the internal logic to optimize the pressure/flow relationship to meet the demand.

Maintainability, Safety & Access

• Air Filter Access: The most frequent maintenance task is changing inlet filters. Access should be at floor level without the need for ladders.
• Sound Attenuation: Noise is a significant health and safety concern. Both manufacturers offer sound enclosures reducing noise to < 75-80 dBA. However, check if this rating is free-field or piping-connected.
• Voltage Safety: VFDs retain high voltage on the DC bus capacitors after shutdown. Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) procedures must account for capacitor discharge times, which should be clearly labeled on the enclosure.

Lifecycle Cost Drivers

The Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculation should assume a 15 to 20-year life. Energy consumption will dwarf the initial purchase price.

• Energy: Calculated using the weighted average power draw based on the plant’s flow frequency distribution.
• Maintenance Consumables: Air filters, coolant (if liquid-cooled), capacitors for the UPS/Drive (every 5-8 years), and eventual core overhauls.
• Core Swap: For high-speed turbos, on-site bearing repair is usually impossible. The “Core” (motor + impeller + housing) is swapped out. The cost of a spare core should be factored into the risk analysis.

COMPARISON TABLES

The following tables provide a direct technical contrast between the two primary technology providers and the technologies themselves. Use these to align equipment characteristics with facility constraints. Table 1 focuses on the Manufacturer comparison, while Table 2 analyzes the Application Fit.

ENGINEER & OPERATOR FIELD NOTES

Real-world reliability is often determined by factors outside the product catalog—specifically, how the equipment is installed, commissioned, and maintained. The following insights are drawn from field experience with Atlas Copco vs Sulzer (ABS) Aeration Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit deployments.

Commissioning & Acceptance Testing

Commissioning is the first time the theoretical design meets hydraulic reality. A standard “bump test” is insufficient for these sophisticated machines.

• Surge Mapping Verification: During startup, the technician must verify the surge line settings. This involves deliberately throttling the machine (carefully) to ensure the controller detects the approach to surge and initiates the blow-off valve or speed reduction before a surge event occurs.
• Harmonic Analysis: Perform a power quality audit at the VFD line side. Verify that Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) for voltage and current remains within IEEE 519 limits while the unit is under load. Background plant noise can sometimes trigger VFD faults in sensitive high-speed drives.
• Temperature Stabilization: Run the unit at full load for at least 4 hours to verify cabinet cooling effectiveness. Inadequate room ventilation often doesn’t show up until the unit trips on “Inverter Over-temp” during the first heatwave.

Common Specification Mistakes

• Over-Sizing: Engineers often apply safety factors on top of safety factors (e.g., standardizing on 100°F inlet temp, plus a 10% flow margin). This forces the blower to operate at the bottom of its turndown curve (the “surge edge”) during average days, causing instability and poor efficiency. It is better to have a modular design (e.g., three smaller blowers) than two massive ones.
• Ignoring Inlet Conditions: Specifying flow in SCFM (Standard Cubic Feet per Minute) without clarifying the site conditions (elevation, humidity, temperature) is a critical error. Blowers compress ACFM (Actual Cubic Feet per Minute). The conversion is significant, especially at high altitudes.
• “Or Equal” Ambiguity: Simply stating “Turbo Blower” allows for air-foil, magnetic, and gear-driven units to be bid equally. If the plant maintenance staff is standardized on magnetic bearings, the specification must clearly define “Active Magnetic Bearings with UPS Backup” to prevent lower-cost mechanical bearing alternatives from qualifying.

O&M Burden & Strategy

The maintenance profiles of Atlas Copco and Sulzer machines differ fundamentally based on the technology selected.

• Sulzer HST / AC ZB (Mag Bearing):
  • Routine: Air filter replacement (quarterly/semi-annually). Cooling fan filter cleaning.
  • Specialized: UPS battery replacement (every 2-4 years). Capacitor replacement (5-8 years).
  • Burden: Very low mechanical labor, but requires high-level electrical/controls troubleshooting skills.

• Atlas Copco ZS (Screw):
  • Routine: Oil level checks, oil changes (annual), oil filter replacement. Air filter changes.
  • Long-term: Bearing replacement (typically >40k hours).
  • Burden: Moderate mechanical labor (classic preventive maintenance), manageable by general plant mechanics.

Troubleshooting Guide

• Symptom: Blower Surging (Pumping Sound/Vibration).
  Cause: System pressure is higher than the blower can generate at that speed, or flow is too low.
  Fix: Check for closed valves downstream, fouled diffusers (increasing backpressure), or verify that the DO control loop isn’t forcing the blower below its minimum speed.
• Symptom: High Discharge Temperature.
  Cause: Intake filter clogged (high pressure ratio), room ventilation failure, or internal cooling loop failure.
  Fix: Check filter differential pressure. Verify room HVAC. Clean internal heat exchangers.

DESIGN DETAILS / CALCULATIONS

Sizing Logic & Methodology

To accurately specify equipment for an Atlas Copco vs Sulzer (ABS) Aeration Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit evaluation, engineers must convert process oxygen demand into blower inlet conditions.

1. Determine AOR (Actual Oxygen Requirement): This comes from the process model (BioWin, GPS-X) based on BOD/Ammonia loading.
2. Calculate SOR (Standard Oxygen Requirement): Correct AOR for site conditions using the Alpha factor (wastewater interference), Beta factor (salinity/TDS), and Theta (temperature) correction.
   Formula Consideration: SOR = AOR / [ (Alpha * (DO_sat – DO_target) / DO_sat_std) * Theta^(T-20) ]
3. Convert SOR to Air Flow (SCFM): Based on the diffuser SOTE (Standard Oxygen Transfer Efficiency). SOTE is depth-dependent.
   Note: Diffuser SOTE drops as airflow per diffuser increases. Iteration is required between blower sizing and diffuser count.
4. Convert SCFM to ICFM (Inlet CFM): Correct for Site Elevation (Barometric Pressure), Relative Humidity, and Maximum Inlet Temperature.
   Critical Check: Ensure the motor has sufficient horsepower to handle the “Cold Day” (densest air) scenario, even if flow is controlled.

Specification Checklist

When preparing the RFP or Bid Documents, ensure these items are explicit:

• Performance Standard: Require testing in accordance with ASME PTC 13 (Wire-to-Air) or ISO 1217 Annex C/E. Do not accept “Shaft Power” ratings; they ignore motor and VFD losses.
• Harmonic Mitigation: Specify “VFD to include Active Front End (AFE) or passive filtering to meet IEEE 519-2014 limits at the device terminals.”
• Communication: Define the data map. “Blower shall provide Modbus TCP/IP output including: Flow, Discharge Pressure, Power (kW), Speed (RPM), Surge Margin, Vibration X/Y, and Bearing Temperature.”
• Warranty: For mag-bearing units, consider asking for a 5-year extended warranty on the Core (Magnetic Bearing Controller + Motor/Impeller), as these are high-cost replacement items.

FAQ SECTION

What is the main difference between Atlas Copco ZB and Sulzer HST blowers?

Both are high-speed, magnetic bearing turbo blowers. The primary difference lies in their lineage and packaging. Sulzer HST (originally ABS) is a dedicated wastewater machine known for its robust magnetic bearing design and long history in the sector. Atlas Copco ZB units leverage the company’s vast industrial compressor background, often featuring highly integrated “plug-and-play” packaging with advanced proprietary controls. Both are premium efficiency machines, but they use different control philosophies and internal component arrangements.

When should I choose a Screw Blower (ZS) over a Turbo Blower (HST/ZB)?

Select a Screw Blower (like the Atlas Copco ZS) when the application requires operation across a wide range of discharge pressures (e.g., SBRs with changing water levels) or when the facility has limited electrical troubleshooting capabilities. Screw blowers are positive displacement machines, meaning their efficiency is less sensitive to pressure fluctuations compared to turbo blowers. They are also generally more robust in harsh industrial environments compared to the sensitive electronics of magnetic bearing turbos.

How often do magnetic bearings need to be replaced?

Theoretically, never. Magnetic bearings levitate the shaft, so there is no physical contact and thus no mechanical wear during operation. However, the auxiliary components supporting them do have a lifespan. The backup landing bearings (used only during power failure) are rated for a specific number of “drop downs” (e.g., 10-20 events). The capacitors or batteries in the magnetic bearing controller (MBC) typically require replacement every 5 to 8 years. Refer to the [[O&M Burden & Strategy]] section for details.

Why is “Wire-to-Air” efficiency important in blower specifications?

“Wire-to-Air” efficiency measures the total energy consumed by the entire package (VFD, motor, cooling fans, filter losses, compression element) to deliver a specific mass of air. Some manufacturers quote “Shaft Efficiency” or “Isentropic Efficiency,” which only looks at the compression element and ignores the losses in the motor and drive. Since the VFD and motor can account for 5-10% of losses, Wire-to-Air is the only way to accurately compare the true electrical cost of Atlas Copco vs Sulzer equipment.

Can I mix different blower technologies in one header?

Yes, this is called “Hybrid” or “Split-Range” control. A common and effective strategy is to use a Screw Blower (Atlas Copco ZS) for the base load or low-flow conditions (due to its stability) and High-Speed Turbos (Sulzer HST or AC ZB) for peak shaving. This leverages the screw’s pressure robustness and the turbo’s peak efficiency. However, the Master Control Panel (MCP) must be specifically programmed to manage the hand-off between these technologies to prevent surging.

CONCLUSION

The choice between Atlas Copco vs Sulzer (ABS) Aeration Equipment: Comparison & Best Fit is rarely a binary decision about which brand is “better.” It is a specific engineering decision regarding which technology fits the hydraulic profile and maintenance culture of the utility. Sulzer’s HST line remains a benchmark for magnetic bearing reliability in municipal wastewater, while Atlas Copco brings formidable industrial packaging and a diverse portfolio (Screw and Turbo) that allows for hybrid optimization.

Engineers should focus their specifications on the operating envelope, demanding rigorous wire-to-air efficiency guarantees and ensuring that the electrical infrastructure (harmonics/power quality) is robust enough to support modern high-speed drives. By prioritizing the system curve over the machine nameplate, utilities can secure a resilient, energy-efficient aeration process that serves reliably for decades.