Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have emerged as a significant environmental concern because of their persistence and potential health risks. With enforceable drinking water limits now measured in parts per trillion, the reliability of PFAS data depends heavily on how samples are collected. At these concentrations, a contaminated glove, the wrong sample bottle, or a waterproof field notebook can introduce more PFAS than the sample itself contains. This article covers the principles and practices of PFAS sampling across water, soil, and other media, with a focus on the precautions that distinguish PFAS sampling from conventional environmental sampling.
PFAS are a large group of synthetic chemicals containing multiple carbon-fluorine bonds, used in non-stick cookware, water-repellent clothing, food packaging, firefighting foam, and many industrial processes.
Environmental Persistence: PFAS are called “forever chemicals” because of their resistance to degradation, which has resulted in widespread contamination of water supplies.
Health Concerns: Exposure to certain PFAS has been linked to liver effects, developmental effects, immune suppression, and increased risk of certain cancers.
Ubiquity: The same properties that make PFAS useful make them common in everyday materials — including many used in field work. This is the central challenge for sampling.
EPA issued drinking water health advisories for several PFAS in 2022, followed in April 2024 by a final regulation setting enforceable maximum contaminant levels, including 4.0 parts per trillion each for PFOA and PFOS. In May 2026, EPA proposed retaining the PFOA and PFOS limits with an optional compliance extension to 2031 and rescinding the limits for four other PFAS; as of September 2026 those remain proposals. Many states maintain their own PFAS standards for drinking water, groundwater, and soil, and state programs often specify sampling requirements of their own.
A 4 ppt limit means that contamination introduced at the level of a few parts per trillion can change a compliance determination. Sampling precautions that would be excessive for most contaminants are necessary for PFAS.
Sampling serves several purposes:
Choosing representative sampling locations is vital. Common approaches include:
This is the most important element of PFAS sampling protocol. Fluoropolymers must be avoided. PTFE — sold under trade names including Teflon — is itself a PFAS material and is one of the most common sources of sample contamination. It must never be used for sample containers, tubing, bailers, augers, or cap liners.
Acceptable and commonly specified materials include:
Materials commonly prohibited or restricted during PFAS sampling include:
Field teams should wash hands before sampling, avoid handling food on site, and document any potential contamination sources present.
Preservation follows the analytical method. Drinking water samples for EPA Method 537.1 are preserved with Trizma, and those for EPA Method 533 with ammonium acetate; both preservatives remove free chlorine. Samples must be chilled promptly, shipped cold with regular ice rather than chemical ice packs, and delivered within the method’s holding time.
Field quality control samples are how contamination is detected when it happens:
A detailed chain of custody demonstrates sample integrity. Documentation must record collection times, personnel, sample identifiers, preservation, and every transfer between custodians.
Soil investigations raise distinct questions around leaching potential and background levels, covered in detail in our guide to PFAS soil testing.
Air sampling for PFAS, typically associated with stack emissions or thermal treatment facilities, uses specialized sampling trains and methods and is generally performed by specialist contractors.
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the standard technique for PFAS analysis. For drinking water, EPA Methods 533 and 537.1 are approved; other matrices require methods validated for those media.
Sampling staff need specific training in PFAS precautions, which differ markedly from routine sampling practice. Written procedures and pre-sampling checklists reduce reliance on memory.
Obtain bottles, preservatives, and blank water from the laboratory performing the analysis, and confirm method, holding times, and shipping arrangements before sampling.
Where sampling affects communities, transparency about what is being sampled, why, and when results will be shared builds trust and cooperation.
At parts-per-trillion concentrations, PFAS data is only as reliable as the sampling behind it. The essentials are consistent across media: avoid fluoropolymer materials entirely, control personal and field sources of contamination, follow the analytical method’s container and preservation requirements, and collect field blanks that demonstrate the sample was not contaminated. Getting these right is what makes the difference between data that supports sound decisions and data that has to be collected again.