Introduction
Ohio stands as a critical junction in the United States water infrastructure landscape, managing two distinct and vital watersheds: the Lake Erie basin to the north and the Ohio River basin to the south. With a highly industrialized history and significant urban density, Ohio’s wastewater infrastructure is extensive, comprising over 2,000 publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). The state is currently in a phase of massive capital reinvestment, driven largely by aging infrastructure needs and federal consent decrees aiming to eliminate Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs).
The regulatory environment is overseen by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), which enforces strict National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, particularly regarding nutrient loads (phosphorus and nitrogen) to combat harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie. Currently, the state serves a population of nearly 11.8 million, with a total treatment capacity exceeding several billion gallons per day. For consulting engineers and equipment vendors, Ohio represents one of the most active markets in the Midwest, heavily supported by the H2Ohio initiative and robust State Revolving Fund (SRF) allocations.
Recent Developments & Projects
In the last 36 months, Ohio has seen a surge in large-scale infrastructure projects. The primary driver remains the mitigation of wet weather flows. Major metropolitan sewer districts—specifically the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD), the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (MSDGC), and the City of Columbus—are midway through multi-billion dollar Long Term Control Plans (LTCPs) mandated by federal consent decrees.
Notable recent developments include:
- Tunnel Systems: Completion of major segments of deep tunnel systems in Columbus (OARS), Cleveland (Project Clean Lake), and Akron (OCIT) to capture combined sewage for treatment rather than overflow.
- Nutrient Removal: Aggressive implementation of phosphorus removal technologies in the Maumee River watershed to protect Lake Erie, supported by H2Ohio grants.
- Energy Neutrality: A growing trend toward thermal hydrolysis and enhanced anaerobic digestion to maximize biogas production for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems, as seen in recent upgrades at the Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center in Columbus.
- Funding Influx: Ohio has been a significant beneficiary of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), utilizing these funds to address emerging contaminants like PFAS and to subsidize projects in disadvantaged communities.
Top 20 Largest Treatment Plants in Ohio
The following list ranks Ohio’s wastewater treatment facilities by design average daily flow capacity (MGD). Note that peak wet weather capacities for these plants are often significantly higher due to CSO capture requirements.
| Rank |
Plant Name |
City/Location |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Operating Authority |
| 1 |
Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center |
Columbus |
114 MGD |
City of Columbus |
| 2 |
Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center |
Cuyahoga Heights |
100 MGD |
NEORSD |
| 3 |
Mill Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Cincinnati |
100 MGD |
MSDGC |
| 4 |
Jackson Pike Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Columbus |
68 MGD |
City of Columbus |
| 5 |
Bay View Water Reclamation Plant |
Toledo |
60 MGD |
City of Toledo |
| 6 |
Easterly Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Cleveland |
94 MGD* |
NEORSD |
| 7 |
Akron Water Reclamation Facility |
Akron |
90 MGD |
City of Akron |
| 8 |
Dayton Water Reclamation Facility |
Dayton |
72 MGD |
City of Dayton |
| 9 |
Little Miami Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Cincinnati |
29 MGD |
MSDGC |
| 10 |
Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Cincinnati |
15 MGD |
MSDGC |
| 11 |
Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Hebron (Ky/Cin Area) |
46 MGD |
SD1 |
| 12 |
Canton Water Reclamation Facility |
Canton |
39 MGD |
City of Canton |
| 13 |
Youngstown Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Youngstown |
35 MGD |
City of Youngstown |
| 14 |
Lakewood Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Lakewood |
34 MGD |
City of Lakewood |
| 15 |
Westerly Wastewater Treatment Center |
Cleveland |
33 MGD |
NEORSD |
| 16 |
Euclid Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Euclid |
26 MGD |
City of Euclid |
| 17 |
Hamilton Water Reclamation Facility |
Hamilton |
24 MGD |
City of Hamilton |
| 18 |
Warren Water Pollution Control Center |
Warren |
16 MGD |
City of Warren |
| 19 |
Lorain Black River WWTP |
Lorain |
15 MGD |
City of Lorain |
| 20 |
Mansfield Wastewater Treatment Plant |
Mansfield |
14 MGD |
City of Mansfield |
*Note: Easterly’s capacity varies by operational mode; listed is typical design flow.
Detailed Profiles of Top 5 Largest Plants
1. Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center (Columbus)
- Location: Columbus, Franklin County
- Design Capacity: 114 MGD (Average), 330 MGD (Peak)
- Population Served: ~700,000 residents
- Operating Authority: City of Columbus, Dept. of Public Utilities
- Receiving Water: Scioto River
Treatment Process: The plant utilizes screening and grit removal, primary clarification, and activated sludge secondary treatment. Disinfection is achieved via chlorination/dechlorination. It features Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment (CEPT) to manage wet weather flows.
Infrastructure: Columbus Southerly is a leader in biosolids management, utilizing gravity thickening, centrifuges, and incineration. The facility recently invested heavily in a new Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment (CEPT) system.
Recent Upgrades: Completion of the $300M+ OARS tunnel system which directs flow to the plant, and major electrical substation upgrades.
2. Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center (Cleveland/NEORSD)
- Location: Cuyahoga Heights, Cuyahoga County
- Design Capacity: 100 MGD (Average), 400+ MGD (Peak)
- Population Served: ~580,000 residents
- Operating Authority: Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD)
- Receiving Water: Cuyahoga River
Treatment Process: Screening, aerated grit removal, primary settling, and a two-stage biological system (plastic media trickling filters followed by activated sludge). Tertiary treatment involves dual media gravity filters.
Infrastructure: Features a Renewable Energy Facility (REF) utilizing fluidized bed incineration for biosolids, generating electricity for the plant.
Notable Compliance: Key facility in NEORSD’s “Project Clean Lake,” reducing annual CSOs from 4.5 billion gallons to under 500 million gallons.
3. Mill Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (Cincinnati)
- Location: Cincinnati, Hamilton County
- Design Capacity: 100 MGD (Average), 240 MGD (Peak)
- Population Served: ~500,000 residents
- Operating Authority: Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (MSDGC)
- Receiving Water: Ohio River
Treatment Process: Uses preliminary screening, primary clarification, activated sludge for secondary treatment, and chlorination/dechlorination.
Recent Upgrades: The plant recently underwent extensive solids handling improvements and odor control upgrades. It is the central hub for MSDGC’s wet weather strategy.
4. Jackson Pike Wastewater Treatment Plant (Columbus)
- Location: Columbus, Franklin County
- Design Capacity: 68 MGD (Average), 100 MGD (Peak)
- Population Served: ~350,000 residents
- Operating Authority: City of Columbus
- Receiving Water: Scioto River
Treatment Process: Conventional activated sludge plant with anaerobic digestion. Biogas produced here is utilized for heating and energy generation.
Infrastructure: Currently undergoing significant master planning for nutrient removal upgrades.
5. Bay View Water Reclamation Plant (Toledo)
- Location: Toledo, Lucas County
- Design Capacity: 60 MGD (Average), 195 MGD (Wet Weather)
- Population Served: ~300,000 residents
- Operating Authority: City of Toledo
- Receiving Water: Maumee River (Lake Erie)
Treatment Process: Activated sludge with high-rate clarification for wet weather flows (Ballasted Flocculation). Critical focus on phosphorus removal.
Recent Upgrades: Part of the Toledo Waterways Initiative, the plant received $90M in upgrades including new aeration basins and high-rate disinfection facilities.
Significant Regional Facilities (Rank 6-20)
- Easterly WWTP (Cleveland): Serves the eastern suburbs and drains to Lake Erie; specialized activated sludge process.
- Akron WRF: Features a BioACT system and recently integrated the massive OCIT tunnel storage system.
- Dayton WRF: Renowned for its rapid sand filtration and large-scale recharge basins.
- Euclid WWTP: Recently completed a $100M+ complete facility replacement/upgrade.
Plants with Approved Budgets & Expansion Projects
Ohio’s wastewater sector is capitalizing on SRF loans and revenue bonds to fund massive wet weather compliance projects. Below are the most significant active capital improvement projects.
A. Major Projects Under Construction (2024-2026)
NEORSD Shoreline Storage Tunnel (Project Clean Lake)
- Location: Cleveland, OH
- Project Scope: Construction of 14,000 feet of soft-ground tunnel (23-ft diameter) to control CSOs along Lake Erie.
- Total Budget: $201 Million
- Funding: WPCLF (SRF) Low-Interest Loan, Revenue Bonds
- Timeline: Construction active; completion expected 2025/2026.
- Key Contractors: McNally/Kiewit (JV).
- Drivers: Consent decree compliance; reduction of 350M gallons of overflow annually.
Columbus Southerly 4th Stage Aeration Improvements
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Project Scope: Rehabilitation of aeration tanks, blower replacements, and diffuser upgrades to improve energy efficiency and ammonia removal.
- Total Budget: $45 Million (Est.)
- Funding: OWDA Loans
- Timeline: Construction ongoing through 2025.
- Drivers: Asset renewal and energy optimization.
Toledo Waterways Initiative – Final Phase
- Location: Toledo, OH
- Project Scope: Finalizing wet weather storage basins and conveyance improvements to the Bay View plant.
- Total Budget: Part of the $527 Million program.
- Current Status: Program nearing 98% completion, final punch-lists active.
- Drivers: EPA Consent Decree.
B. Projects in Design/Planning Phase (2025-2027)
- MSDGC Lower Mill Creek Partial Remedy (Cincinnati):
- Budget: ~$50-$100 Million (Phased)
- Scope: “Smart sewer” technologies and strategic separation/storage to manage CSOs without massive new tunnels.
- Status: Design and Adaptive Management phase.
- Akron WRF Headworks Upgrade:
- Budget: $25 Million
- Scope: Replacement of screening and grit removal systems to handle higher peak flows from the new tunnel.
- Status: Design complete, bidding soon.
C. Recently Completed Major Projects (2022-2024)
- Euclid WWTP Replacement: A $110M comprehensive rebuild of the primary and secondary treatment trains, completed in 2023.
- NEORSD Doan Valley Storage Tunnel: $142M tunnel project completed in 2022 to control overflows in the University Circle area.
Summary Statistics: Ohio Capital Investment
- Total Active Capital Investment: >$3.2 Billion (active consent decrees & upgrades)
- Number of Plants with Major Active Projects: 35+ facilities
- Primary Project Drivers:
- CSO/SSO Consent Decrees (65%)
- Nutrient/Phosphorus Removal (20%)
- Asset Renewal/Aging Infrastructure (15%)
- Major Funding Sources: Ohio Water Development Authority (OWDA), H2Ohio Grants, WIFIA Loans.
Regulatory & Compliance Landscape
Ohio operates under a delegated NPDES program managed by the Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water. The regulatory landscape is currently defined by two major pressures:
- Lake Erie Nutrient Targets: Under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and domestic action plans, plants in the northern watershed (Toledo, Cleveland, etc.) face stringent total phosphorus limits (often 1.0 mg/L or lower) to combat algal blooms.
- CSO Long Term Control Plans: Virtually every major Ohio river city is under a consent decree. Regulators are increasingly open to “Integrated Planning” frameworks, allowing utilities to prioritize high-impact projects (like Green Infrastructure) over gray infrastructure if the environmental benefit is proven.
Technology Trends in Ohio
Engineering firms and vendors should note the following technology adoption trends across the state:
- Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment (CEPT): Widely adopted in Columbus and Toledo to treat massive volumes of wet weather flow without biological upset.
- Thermal Hydrolysis (THP): Gaining traction for biosolids processing to reduce volume and increase Class A biosolid production.
- Real-Time Control (RTC): “Smart Sewer” sensors and actuated gates are being aggressively deployed in Cincinnati and South Bend (nearby) to maximize in-system storage, reducing the need for new concrete tanks.
- UV Disinfection: Rapidly replacing gaseous chlorine systems to improve safety and reduce residuals in aquatic habitats.
Complete Directory of Facilities
Browse our comprehensive directory of wastewater treatment plants in Ohio. (Select links below for full plant details).
Major Regional Facilities (>50 MGD)
- Southerly WWTC (Columbus)
- Southerly WWTC (NEORSD)
- Mill Creek WWTP (Cincinnati)
- Jackson Pike WWTP
- Easterly WWTP
- Akron WRF
- Dayton WRF
- Bay View WRP (Toledo)
Municipal Plants (10-50 MGD)
- Canton WRF
- Dry Creek WWTP
- Lakewood WWTP
- Westerly WWTC
- Little Miami WWTP
- Hamilton WRF
- Lorain Black River WWTP
- Warren WPCC
Resources for Engineers & Operators
- Ohio Water Environment Association (OWEA): www.ohiowea.org – The primary professional association for networking and training.
- Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water: Operator certification and permitting details.
- Ohio Water Development Authority (OWDA): The primary funding arm for water infrastructure loans in the state.
- Operator Training: The Operator Training Committee of Ohio (OTCO) offers CEUs and exam prep.
FAQ
- How many wastewater treatment plants are in Ohio?
- Ohio has over 2,000 permitted Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs), ranging from massive regional facilities to small package plants.
- What is the largest wastewater treatment plant in Ohio?
- The Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center in Columbus is generally considered the largest by average flow, treating over 114 MGD on average.
- Which Ohio cities are under Consent Decrees for sewage?
- Most major Ohio cities including Columbus, Cincinnati (MSDGC), Cleveland (NEORSD), Akron, Toledo, and Lima are operating under consent decrees to reduce Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs).
- What funding is available for WWTP upgrades in Ohio?
- Funding is primarily available through the Water Pollution Control Loan Fund (WPCLF) managed by the Ohio EPA and OWDA. Additionally, H2Ohio grants are available specifically for nutrient reduction projects.
- What are the nutrient removal requirements in Ohio?
- Plants discharging into the Lake Erie watershed face strict phosphorus limits, often capped at 1.0 mg/L, with many facilities optimizing to reach 0.5 mg/L to prevent algal blooms.