Municipal engineers frequently underestimate the complexity of chemical injection at remote lift stations. While the primary sewage pumps receive the bulk of the design attention, the auxiliary chemical feed systems are often the critical defense against the wastewater industry’s most pervasive enemies: hydrogen sulfide ($H_2S$) corrosion, noxious odors, and Fat, Oil, and Grease (FOG) accumulation. A poorly specified metering pump in a remote lift station leads to vapor-locked lines, untreated sewage entering the force main, and accelerated degradation of concrete infrastructure—potentially costing utilities millions in premature rehabilitation costs.
This article serves as a comprehensive Selection Guide: How to Specify Metering Pumps for Municipal Lift Stations. Unlike treatment plant applications where operators are present daily, lift station equipment must operate autonomously in harsh, uncontrolled environments. The chemical feed systems here are typically tasked with dosing Calcium Nitrate, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ferric salts, or proprietary biological additives into the wet well or force main. These applications demand a distinct set of engineering criteria compared to standard process dosing.
The consequences of poor selection include frequent site visits for re-priming, loss of chemical containment, and failure to meet environmental compliance regarding odor control. This guide will help engineers, directors, and operators navigate the specific hydraulic, material, and control challenges inherent to lift station chemical metering, ensuring long-term reliability and accurate dosage control.
Developing a robust specification requires analyzing the intersection of chemical properties, hydraulic constraints, and the unique operating rhythm of a sewage lift station. This section outlines the critical criteria for the Selection Guide: How to Specify Metering Pumps for Municipal Lift Stations.
The operating envelope for a lift station metering pump is defined by the diurnal flow curve of the wastewater collection system. Unlike constant-process applications, lift station flows can vary largely from peak morning usage to near-zero flow in the middle of the night.
The chemical selected dictates the material construction of the pump’s “wet end.” Mismatching materials is a leading cause of early failure.
Lift station applications often involve suction lift scenarios, where the chemical storage (tote or tank) is at grade level, and the pump may be mounted on top of the tank or a nearby skid.
Lift stations are frequently located in residential neighborhoods, roadside easements, or low-lying areas. Space is at a premium.
In a plant, an operator walks by daily. At a lift station, a pump may not be inspected for a week. Reliability is the primary driver of lifecycle cost.
The metering pump must integrate seamlessly with the lift station’s RTU or PLC.
Maintenance at lift stations is often performed by a single operator working out of a truck.
Engineers must evaluate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), not just the bid price.
The following tables provide a direct comparison of the technologies and application scenarios relevant to the Selection Guide: How to Specify Metering Pumps for Municipal Lift Stations. Use Table 1 to select the pump technology and Table 2 to determine the application fit.
| Technology | Primary Features | Best-Fit Applications | Limitations | Maintenance Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peristaltic (Hose/Tube) | – Self-priming (high suction lift) – Can run dry – No check valves to clog – Handles off-gassing fluids perfectly |
– Sodium Hypochlorite – Viscous polymers – High-suction lift scenarios – Remote/unmanned sites |
– Limited discharge pressure (typically <125 psi) – Periodic tube replacement required |
Low/Predictable: Change tube/hose every 3-12 months. No other wetted parts to service. |
| Solenoid Diaphragm | – Low initial cost – High precision at fixed conditions – Compact footprint |
– Clean, simple chemicals – Indoor/climate-controlled stations – Flooded suction applications |
– Prone to vapor lock (off-gassing) – Check valves foul with dirty fluids – Poor suction lift capabilities |
Moderate: Requires regular cleaning of check valves. Diaphragm replacement 12-24 months. |
| Motor-Driven Diaphragm | – Higher pressure capabilities – Robust mechanical drive – Higher flow rates |
– Injection into high-pressure force mains – Large volume dosing (Master Lift Stations) |
– Higher CAPEX – Susceptible to vapor lock without auto-degassing heads – Check valve maintenance |
Moderate: Oil changes for gearbox, diaphragm kits, check valve cleaning. |
| Progressive Cavity | – Non-pulsating flow – Handles high solids/sludge |
– Polymer activation (rare in lift stations) – Extremely viscous fluids |
– Cannot run dry (instant stator failure) – Expensive repair parts – Large footprint |
High: Stator and rotor wear. Seal maintenance. strictly requires run-dry protection. |
| Application Scenario | Chemical Agent | Key Constraint | Recommended Pump Type | Critical Spec Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odor Control (H2S) | Calcium Nitrate / Bioxide | Variable flow pacing required | Peristaltic or Motor Diaphragm | 4-20mA input for flow pacing; High turndown ratio. |
| Disinfection / Septicity | Sodium Hypochlorite (Bleach) | Gas binding (Vapor lock) | Peristaltic | Must handle gas bubbles without loss of prime. |
| FOG Control | Bacteria / Enzymes | Low flow rates; Viscous fluid | Peristaltic | Timer-based batch dosing; wide tube ID for viscosity. |
| Force Main Injection | Ferric Chloride / Iron Salts | High backpressure; Corrosive | Motor Diaphragm (Hydraulic or Mechanical) | PVDF/Teflon wetted parts; Injection quill with check valve. |
Beyond the catalog specifications, real-world success relies on proper implementation. The following notes are derived from field experience in commissioning and maintaining lift station chemical feeds.
Commissioning a metering pump at a lift station requires verifying performance across the full flow range, not just a “bump test.”
Engineers often copy-paste specifications from treatment plant projects to lift stations, leading to errors.
Operational strategies must align with the “remote” nature of the site.
Proper sizing is the foundation of the Selection Guide: How to Specify Metering Pumps for Municipal Lift Stations. The following methodology ensures the pump meets process requirements.
To size the pump, you must calculate the required chemical feed rate in Gallons Per Hour (GPH).
Step 1: Determine the Chemical Mass Required
$$Mass (lbs/day) = Flow (MGD) \times Dosage (mg/L) \times 8.34$$
Note: Flow should be the Peak Hourly Flow for sizing the max capacity, and Average Daily Flow for operational estimates.
Step 2: Convert Mass to Gallons of Solution
Most chemicals are not 100% active. You must account for solution strength and specific gravity.
$$Volume (GPD) = \frac{Mass (lbs/day)}{Specific Gravity \times 8.34 \times (\% Solution/100)}$$
Step 3: Convert to Pump Output (GPH)
$$Rate (GPH) = \frac{Volume (GPD)}{24 hours}$$
Design Example:
A lift station has a peak flow of 2.0 MGD. We need to dose Bioxide (Calcium Nitrate) at 3.5 gallons per 10,000 gallons of flow (a common volume-based metric for Bioxide).
Selection: Select a pump capable of ~40-50 GPH to ensure the operating point (29 GPH) is in the middle of the curve, allowing room for future flow increases.
When writing the Division 43 or 46 specification, ensure these items are explicitly called out:
Peristaltic (hose) pumps are often preferred in the Selection Guide: How to Specify Metering Pumps for Municipal Lift Stations because they are self-priming, can run dry without damage, and do not have check valves. Lift station applications often involve off-gassing chemicals (like hypochlorite) and suction lift conditions that cause diaphragm pumps to vapor lock or lose prime. The lower maintenance requirement of simply changing a hose is ideal for remote, unmanned sites.
The metering pump must be rated for a pressure higher than the maximum possible pressure in the receiving pipe. For force main injection, this is the force main dynamic head plus friction losses, plus a safety margin (typically 10-15%). However, you must also account for pressure spikes (water hammer) caused by the main sewage pumps starting and stopping. Installing an injection quill with an integral check valve helps isolate the metering pump from these spikes.
Manual pacing involves setting the pump to run at a fixed speed (e.g., 50%) whenever it is on. This is simple but inefficient for lift stations with variable flow. Flow pacing (or flow proportional dosing) utilizes a 4-20mA signal from the lift station’s flow meter to automatically adjust the chemical pump speed to match the incoming wastewater flow. This maintains a constant chemical dosage (ppm) regardless of flow volume, preventing waste and ensuring compliance.
For peristaltic pumps in continuous lift station service, tubing typically requires replacement every 3 to 6 months, or up to 12 months for intermittent duty. Factors affecting tube life include the chemical being pumped, the system pressure, the pump speed (rpm), and ambient temperature. Most manufacturers provide life-expectancy charts based on hours of operation. It is best practice to replace tubes proactively during scheduled preventive maintenance rather than waiting for failure.
Generally, no. Installing chemical metering pumps inside the wet well is discouraged due to corrosion, difficult access for maintenance, and electrical classification issues (Class 1 Division 1 environments). Best practice is to locate the chemical pump and tank in a separate, ventilated enclosure or building at grade level, and run the discharge tubing down into the wet well or force main valve vault.
Specifying the correct equipment using this Selection Guide: How to Specify Metering Pumps for Municipal Lift Stations is critical for the longevity of wastewater infrastructure. While the metering pump is a small fraction of the station’s total cost, its failure leads to septic conditions, odor complaints, and rapid corrosion of concrete assets.
Engineers must move beyond simple catalog flow rates and consider the holistic environment of the lift station: the intermittent flows, the remote location, the harsh weather, and the specific chemical properties. By selecting robust technologies like peristaltic pumps for difficult fluids, integrating smart control strategies, and designing for maintainability, utilities can ensure their chemical feed systems protect their infrastructure effectively for decades.